de | en

 

Hans-Jörg Simon
Print  Previous entry Next entry 
Lawyer
Jurist/Lawyer
image
Helene-Mayer-Ring 4
80809 München
+ 49 151 55 040 095
Sprachen/Languages:
Deutsch/German, Englisch/English , Italienisch/Italian
Memberships:
Hanseatic Bar Association of Hamburg, Friends of the Tugboat Fairplay VIII
Focus:
Contract Law, Trade and Corporate Law, Tax Law, Investment Law, Specialist for Tax Law
Miscellaneous:
Background • since 2019 Director Structuring with Golding Capital Partners GmbH, Munich • 2011 - 2019 General Counsel and Managing Director at Hansa Heavy Lift GmbH, Hamburg • 2010 - 2011 Senior Counsel Corporate and Tax at Beluga Shipping GmbH, Bremen • 2008 - 2010 Rechtsanwalt (Lawyer) at Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek, Hamburg • 2006 - 2008 Rechtsanwalt (Lawyer)at SJ Berwin, LLP in Berlin • 2000 - 2006 Rechtsanwalt (Lawyer) at Nörr Stiefenhofer Lutz, Munich • 1993 - 2000 Legal Studies and Traineeship in Munich, Mainz and Rome Publications: • GWR 2012, 350: Comment to the Judgment of the German Federal High Court of Justice dated 23.04.2012; Case No. II ZR 75/10: No error in the sales prospectus in case of a failure of the predicted return • GWR 2011, 476: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Munich dated 12.09.2011; Case No. 19 U 28/11: Compensation for damages are based on the actual spent financing costs • GWR 2011, 387: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Frankfurt a.M., dated 18.05.2011; Case Nos. 17 U 253/10, 17 U 12/11 : Emission rebate to the bank has to be notified in the sales prospectus– Expansion of the kick-back- jurisdiction • GWR 2011, 89: Comment to the Judgment of the German Federal High Court of Justice dated 21.12.2010, Case Nos. XI ZB 25/10, XI ZB 28/10, XI ZB 29/10: Suspension decision subject to § 7 I KapMuG is only binding in case of prospectus liability in a narrow sense • GWR 2010, 279: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Karlsruhe, dated 28.04.2010, Case No. 6 U 155/07: No prospectus liability of celebrities in case of an advertisement for an investment • GWR 2010, 6: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Frankfurt a.M., dated 20.10.2009, Case No. 14 U 98/08: Bank advisor must notify provisions that are not mentioned in the sales prospectus • GWR 2009, 378: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Oldenburg, dated 11.09.2009, Case No. 11 U 75/08: No prospectus liability in case of an unavoidable error in law by the issuer • GWR 2009, 323: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Karlsruhe, dated 03.03.2009, Case No. 17 U 149/07: Broad information duty by the advisor in case of conflict in interest • GWR 2009, 199: Comment to the Judgment of the Higher Regional of Court of Frankfurt a. M., dated 27.05.2009, Case Nos. 23 U 160/07, 23 U 161/07, 23 U 162/07, 23 U 212/07, 23 U 69/07: Investment advisor is not an assistant of the issuer • GWR 2009, 142: Comment to the Judgment of the German Federal High Court of Justice dated 27.04.2009, Case No. II ZR 167/07: Shareholders resolution regarding a general restriction of the information rights can be challanged without a specific proof of the need of legal relief • DStR 2007, 557: The new fees for the issuing of a binding tax ruling • IStR 2005, 398 - 405: The taxation of royalty fees within the German-American transactions • Handbook for the specialized lawyer for trade and corporate law, Helmut Büchel / Wolf-Georg Freiherr von Rechenberg (pub.), 2nd Edition 2011, Chapter 7, The general partnership ()